data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e6b0/4e6b009db035469c7b906b4dfb1ce9184a1850e3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb0db/bb0db7b741c462b91ba93fadf5d0b4113eeba7af" alt=""
Will Smith looks as though he’s hardly aged and tommy lee’s face is melting. Now the whole going back into time thing was pretty cool but a little clichéd…and even though we eventually find out why there are secrets even the universe doesn’t know…and time travel was “outlawed” the inventor was jailed with the worst criminal ever (have we learnt nothing about the transfer of information in prison, and wasn’t Boris in solitatary confinement?) his son is free to roam new York and provide time travel services to random people. Let’s just fast forward to when Agent J meets up with the above wanker, blah blah blah, shows him the box with the gadget…1 is missing…and I’m wondering why this kid is still alive…why didn’t Boris kill him? Does he need him to get back to the present? (apparently not) and why didn’t he take both gadgets to prevent pursuit? I still don’t get it. Now this whole movie has this random inception thing going on, the worst of which is when Agent J jumps off the launch pad with Boris and then goes 5mins back in time to re-live the fight only this time he dodges all the spikes (a la Matrix and Wanted)and wins the fight. Now why oh why, didn’t someone do this earlier? Did Boris loose his jumper?
Now on to more sensitive issues. Never mind that Will smith
was practically the only speaking minority in the movie, they had to
conveniently go back in time to 1969, just a year after the passage of the
civil rights act and a mere 4 years after the passage of the voting act in the
USA, the time travellers son having made comments about how un-cool the 60’s
were for “blacks” apart from being pulled over, the depiction of the era was
unfairly inaccurate. Why the bobs, vintage cut suits, period cars and décor?
Why do a perfect job of going back in time only to sugar coat a necessary
truth? Is it because it’s a family
movie? (I cite the episode of family guy in the diner) please keep it real,
make a point. Vampire diaries keeps it strangely painfully real and
consistent…with all witches being black-ish and being slaves or servants in the
civil war era throwbacks, but that’s another blog. A black general? I see…Now race issues aside, Agent J didn’t
know his father…fine…but who was he raised by? I’m guessing not his mom…was he
neuralised and put up for adoption by Agent K? wow…and was K keeping tabs on
him till he was recruited? Or was that just a coincidence? Hmm… 1 more thing…if
K died in ’69…who recruited K? and why was he still an agent? How do you overlook
the whole premise of your movie?
I think K's being recruited as agent of MIB (Sexist) falls into the lores of time travel, Fate. So its improbable, but not impossible that he gets recruited, besides the story did clearly state that the one who the event happens around is the only one not affected by the change in time, hence the whole chocolate milk. Although it begs the question, if he remembers old J, how do others not, yet recognize K as valid MIB personnel and still call him K?
ReplyDeleteOddly, the US army was less segregated than society back in 1969. I'm not sure I'll go as high as general, but blacks were better ranked there in the '60s than in society
The rest I totally agree with.
Least Flawed Time travel movie would be Back to the Future. For simple reasons. Keep it simple stupid, then you wont have to invent phenomena like chocolate milk to gloss over tough questions. Although that WAS funny.
All in all, I was satisfied with MIB III too. Still funny, which is hard to do with sequels these days, which rather go for self-important